Y2K Fashion Cannot Hurt Me

I have become insane, and the fault is, of course: Y2K nostalgia. It’s not my fault. It’s just time, and a thousand teenagers who were presumably all hatched from waterlogged river eggs last Wednesday. They want the tight long-sleeved t-shirts in muted green colours that drape over the hips with extra long fabric for alien-length torsos and contain a cute, feminine little neck detail - perhaps a few nonfunctional buttons.

Bella Swan wears a nice white top.
Bella Swan in her beautiful white marl long-sleeved Henley top. She is a genius.

In 2008, or thereabouts, I had a red striped Primark t-shirt. That was my favourite thing, and sometimes I still miss it. This was when Primark was exciting and hyper-cheap and trendy, before the Rita Ora lines and non-stop licensed IPs. Topshop was around. The little buttons were there for us.

How many Friends clothing items can the world possibly need?

Anyway, I try not to look at clothes because I feel the allure taking hold of me. I feel the curse flaring up within, but I have enough clothes and I think at this point I always will. There is no need to ever buy clothes aside from when something in particular disintigrates in my very hands. Nevertheless, I am a sucker, and numerous things that I never really wore in the 2000s myself now capture my attention.

A collage of various girls with strappy best tops, and some sunflowers.
The strappy top brigade.

Largely, strappy tops. This is something I wear now (and do already own), but I was not a vest owner back then. I needed to be t-shirted up. But I love the cute and sometimes cluttered look with a simple little top. Nice.
MSPaint drawing of a woman in simple t-shirt and trousers. Text reads: "unassuming normal woman".
Literally me.

I did wear the simple long sleeve in green or black. And there’s just something about a tight, long-sleeved shirt. With some jeans. I love it. That’s a simple woman’s outfit. And I could be her.

Bella Swan wears her long-sleeved top under a short-sleeved top. She is a genius.

My aunt has had a mystery black hoodie lurking in her house for some time. It’s not mine, it’s not, seemingly, anyone else’s. But after maybe a year of trying to locate its owner, she told me she was going to throw it out. So it’s mine now.

A grainy webcam photo of a woman wearing a nondescript black hoodie.
Really good picture of the hoodie.

And in a way, this is the perfect clothing item of the 2000s. It just needs a Slipknot logo to really take me back there.

Delicious 2026

Good January to you, dear reader.

A drawing of a girl holding the number "2026".

I'm not really, traditionally, a New Year's resolution type person. I prefer to just drift along as usual, but I also just regularly try new things and get into a new goal, so I think overall it can feel a bit redundant. I don't have any amazing ideas springing to mind for this new and delicious year, but it is true that in 2025 I finally came to understand that mysterious beast we call "the gym". And as it turns out, I like her. Except for her cancellation policies, which are always bad, and which always incur a string of emails that feel like you're being pursued by the most inept police force in the world. They can only communicate via email, but their pursuit of you is certainly relentless.

A drawing of a muscly man using a cable machine. A girl taps him on the bum and asks, "can I use the cable machine pls?"

So that's one glorious habit formed, crystallised, made permanent within me. And I do have the gentle suggestion of bicep muscles at this time. They are real. I hope they won't sink back into me and smooth out. I'd like to have a trace of evidence.

Anyway, I do have some vague interests, let's put it that way. I read thirteen books in 2025. I'd like to read a higher number this year, and in particular some non-fiction, focusing on early American history. Thomas Jefferson and all that. John Adams, who so far I have learned liked his wife. Good for him.

A drawing of John Adams thinking, "I lurve my wife".

I also received a diary for Christmas, and a beautiful fountain pen, so it goes without saying that a physical diary entry is going to be happening to me every day - in that luscious school-blue ink. Very good. I've missed keeping a diary.

A drawing of a girl happily writing in a diary. Text reads: "dear diary, today was stinky".

Mostly, though, the major thing I want to do is make more videos. It's tough to get the pace right considering things like variable video length (I'm working on an hour-long one, and while that's great for a big chunky video that viewers can sink into, it's extremely bad for getting videos made in reasonable time-frames). I've been making a video for Patreon every month since June, and so in six months I'll be able to start posting those publicly (my whole thing there is that they're exclusive for a year, and then go fully public). I'm pretty excited to be able to do that, but it means that until then, my public output looks low - because I'm spending time making sure those bonus videos are done every month, instead of just making more public videos that can be seen by all.

I also had the trouble of a repetitive strain injury, which meant I had to massively reduce my editing time so that I could rest, and so a video I wanted to get done in October will now, in the best case scenario, be posted in January. I'm hoping to improve my workflow to mitigate this sort of thing, and it might just require the videos I make to be shorter for the foreseeable future. I'm not totally sure what exactly I'm going to do, I just know that this is the major thing I'd like to improve in the next year. Become better at making the videos.

But that's boring, so whatever. I'll read 43 books. I'll watch Pluribus. I'll draw every picture on my phone. I'll rotoscope some animations of Saul Goodman. Yeah.

Two dogs stand side-by-side. They stare blankly at the viewer.

Happy New Year! 

Yellowjackets is Weird

Okay reader, I’ll stop re-reading my own Letterboxd reviews and chuckling to myself, and talk to you about my media diet, or whatever.

Sophie Thatcher as Natalie in Yellowjackets.
There she is... miss thing.

I haven’t been watching that many movies lately. I’ve been pushed away from movies by an evil spirit - or the combo of unstoppable, alluring work, and the fact that I watched a boring movie recently (Tom Holland Spider-man Movie - sorry).

About a month ago, I developed a little bit of a repetitive strain injury from reading too much on my phone (I strained my poor thumbs), and I knew I had to give my hands a good, proper rest and watch something in utmost stillness. For a while, I’ve had Yellowjackets on the docket, so I watched the first season of that. And let me tell you, that thing was not what I expected. Spoilers incoming.

Misty Quigley looks off to the side.


I was excited for teen girls stranded in the woods and some possible cannibalism. Yay, I thought, picturing that. Imagine my shock and confusion when instead, I got a goofy, way over-the-top supernatural drama where something mystical and insane happens every episode, and where we spend half of our time in 2021 with the bleak adult versions of the characters. I was not ready for there to be ghosts and ghouls. I was not ready for the magic mushrooms forest orgy. I was not ready for Natalie’s violently abusive dad to accidentally blast his own head off so that she didn’t have to murder him herself (he doesn’t show up in a single other episode btw).

I feel torn between hating this show, and accepting and enjoying its Scooby Doo antics.

On the pro side: 

  • Christina Ricci’s impressive performance as a self-assured and confident weirdo hated by the other survivors
  • Sophie Thatcher shooting a gun
  • the Christian character who inexplicably dies in a second plane crash after surviving the first
  • adult Misty/Natalie buddy comedy moments
  • “you’re the queer Kamala”
A close-up of adult Taissa. Subtitle reads, "You're the queer Kamala."

On the con side:

  • Shauna and Jeff (I hate them deeply)
  • dangerous levels of chaos that escalate so rapidly that the show immediately struggles to maintain its stakes
  • largely dry and dull adult scenes
  • they do Jackie unbelievably dirty
  • “you’re the queer Kamala”

 A close-up of adult Taissa. Subtitle reads, "You're the queer Kamala."

As you can see, it’s a tough call. I’m peeved because they froze poor Jackie to death, and I think that’s an undignified and embarrassing end for her. She should have at least gotten the chance to embarrass and harm Shauna for betraying her and getting big-time pregnant the night before the plane crash with Jackie’s own boyfriend (really, it’s a stupid show), but no, for some reason we watch Shauna cuss her out and then Jackie whimpers and marches outside to die in the incoming snowfall. That’s how we end the season. And it sucks.

Jackie frozen in the snow.
Nooooo. Wake up girl!

Also, Jeff is dangerously insane for so many reasons, but not least because he reveals to Jackie’s mother’s face (a grieving woman!) that he and Shauna were sleeping together while Jackie was still alive and in a relationship with him. Okay weirdo!

Adult Shauna, wearing an absent expression.

Overall, I think there are some intractable problems with the writing, the often cartoonish tone, and the hit-and-miss quality of the acting, but there are some really fun sequences, compelling reveals, and as always, my favourite freak, Misty. I might be duty-bound to watch the second season just for her. My little devil. My icon. I love her.

Adult Misty staring directly at the viewer.

She did nothing wrong.

Misty, looking a little perturbed.

The Lost Daughter: A Book of Pure Horror

A photo of an early 20th century girl in a white dress, holding a bouquet of flowers.
A girl with flowers, ca. 1905.

 Books are crazy. In March of this year, I started reading Les MisΓ©rables. It's a long one, of course, but still, I feel a slight shame, because that thing remains unfinished. I have six hundred pages to go. It's dense and thick with themes and allegorical, freaky characters and historical allusions that often escape me. If I was French, I sometimes think, I would have that beautiful base of cultural osmosis with which to use as a knife and fork here. I like the book a lot. I enjoy Victor Hugo's passion for opining on the battles of Napoleon. But I don't necessarily always "get" it. I am an alien to 19th Century France.

Still, hopefully soon, I will finish it.

A man (is it Quasimodo?) scales the Notre Dame.
Notre-Dame de Paris, by Luc-Olivier Merson, ca. 1881.

On the other hand, I was reminded recently of the movie 'The Lost Daughter' (I watched a hate video about Dakota Johnson which briefly mentioned it). I watched this movie a while ago and was struck by something in it, some stone of intrigue lurking inside. On rewatch, I remembered how bleak the experience was - not just because the movie concerns itself with child abandonment wrapped in a certain kind of eternal and unshakeable despair, but because the movie veers away from its core - the deep cut of thankless motherhood - quickly.

Screenshot of Dakota Johnson looking upset. A subtitle reads: 'Is this gonna pass?'

And lads, I love a womanpain movie. I love movies that explore that murky sense of being in a big emotional hole of extreme yet muted suffering because, BECAUSE, you're a woman. Oh my God. There is such a sense of connection to be found in such a movie. And it's that which drew me in - the unmistakable scent of a bleeding woman, a woman biting her lip - but the movie feels so much like watching a tube man fill with air and then deflate again. What is our protagonist, Leda, all about? She comes across as something of a simple weirdo. Played wonderfully by my own special beautiful angel Olivia Colman, yes, but still, she's a sort of distant cartoon, in the end.

So I read the book, a rapid 128 pages, and it felt electric. In it, Leda is no longer a meandering woman appearing to be have a continued, segmented breakdown, but a completely normal person doing normal things at the beach. Her stealing of the child's doll, the centre of the novel, while a sort of moment of madness, is simply a small, thoughtless act, completely matter-of-fact. She is not a lunatic, but then of course this is easier to communicate when we are, as is the beauty of first-person novels, inside her head.

The book cover - an undressed doll, baring her bum, faces a hot pink wall.

What I like most about her character, then, is her frustration. This, more than anything, is the feeling that permeates her relationship with the world around her. The movie makes a number of slightly sensational or in some cases more sanitised decisions - Leda says something seductive to the old man and then immediately runs away (in the book she merely imagines doing so), Elena the beach child is always is crying (in the book she is described as having a more sinister, quiet air of total need which doesn't require tears), Leda slams a door but never hits her child (in the book she cannot quite resist a physical retaliation).

Screenshot of Olivia Colman's character resting on a sun lounger.

It's flattened in a number of ways, as is often the case with film adaptations, and so of course I came to the book with the image of the movie in my mind, and was astonished at some of the differences which work to make the book so effective where the film languishes.

One of the things I love is that Leda is always relating things not just to her daughters, but to her mother as well.

 "My mother had rarely yielded to the games I tried to play with her body. She immediately got nervous, she didn't like being the doll. She laughed, pulled away, grew angry."

No longer are Leda's struggles with motherhood purely hers. They exude from all other mothers, and her thoughts cross perfectly from her own experiences as a mother to her experiences as the child of one. It paints a precise picture of the intricacies of the sacrifice and strain of it all, not just in Leda's suffering as an individual mother who, ultimately, might not like her children, but as a pattern that can be traced across mothers as a whole - who might all, at one time or another, come to despise their children and the constant presence of the children's need to be cared for.

"I was so desolate in those years. I could no longer study. I played without joy, my body felt inanimate, without desires."

A screenshot from The Simpsons, of Marge taking a sip from her drink while bathing in the tub.
Famous mother Marge.

The Lost Daughter is in some ways quite difficult to stomach. It brings with it a sense of lurking anxiety. Reading it feels a bit disgusting. There is something undeniably disturbing about Leda and her keen distaste for her daughters. But this is what makes it so compelling, so powerful. Leda rages at the world she finds herself in, despairs at the loss of her personhood, details the feeling of her own body no longer being hers.

"Ah, to make them invisible, to no longer hear the demands of their flesh as commands more pressing, more powerful than those which came from mine." 

She lives a life that flits between that strangled anguish, that well of regret, and muted acceptance. There is nothing to be done. There are no take-backs.

"My body became a bloody liquid; suspended in it was a mushy sediment inside which grew a violent polyp, so far from anything human that it reduced me, even though it fed and grew, to rotting matter without life. Nani, with her black spittle, resembles me when I was pregnant for the second time."

 

It's an insane, vivid, gorgeous book of pure horror and its necessary integration into mundane reality.
It's incredible. ★★★★★.

An engraving depicting a girl with a grotesque face where her bottom should be.
A Girl with Two Faces, ca. 1892, by JosΓ© Guadalupe Posada.

The Scary Game

 Last month I played an eclectic and quite frankly, intellectual sequence of games, including The Smurfs for the Nintendo 3DS. I was happy then. I was loving life. In the beautiful yet terrifying month of October, however, I have been playing one game only - The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 3D.

Link discovers Navi. Dialogue text reads: "a fairy?!"
Cutie alert!
 
Now, as you surely know, this is a game of great honour. Everyone loves the first 3D Zelda game, with all its woodsy spirit and chunky glory. And I can see why. Traversing Hyrule is delightful. I feel like a real tiny little forest boy, excited to slam each new skeleton with my cute little sword. Pumped up to smash another pot. Life is a dream. And there are things that feel impressive about the environment - the oscillating, rapid sunsets that make you feel even smaller, the wonderful and varied characters.

A screenshot from my 3DS activity log that shows 17 hours+ of Ocarina of Time play.
Let's not talk about 'The Bachelor' at this time.

There's something vivid about this Hyrule, especially when you accidentally sleep through seven years and awaken to find that you have a new, lanky man-body, and are in the haunted ruin of a once-bustling town.

A dark screenshot of Ocarina of Time, just after Link becomes an adult. Text reads: "Link... we're back in the Temple of Time... But have seven years really passed?"

People talk about how dark Majora's Mask is, but Ocarina has its own delicious sense of death. At one point, Ganon jumps out of paintings on a glowing ghost horse to attack you. He is demonic. I love him.

Ganondorf looks directly at the camera, with scary eyes. Dialogue box reads: "Pathetic little fool! Do you realize who you are dealing with?!"
A genuine weirdo.

I very much enjoy the atmosphere, and the cute and goofy and severe characters you come across (in one area there are a thousand dogs who will follow you at night), but there is also something frustrating and impenetrable about the game. Its gameplay feels, at times, like trying to get blood from a stone. Yes, there are a few reminder systems that make it impossible to get completely lost on your next big goal (thank you Navi), but it's the small steps that tend to feel puzzling.

Link looks at a stern farmhand. Farmhand says, "Listen. The great Ganondorf recognized my obvious talents and gave the ranch to me!"

I didn't play this game as a kid, so I can't approach it from that determined perspective. Maybe if I had, I would feel differently about the obtuse piecing together of What To Do Next, but for me, it feels like an awfully stressful game. I've played with and without a guide, and in both cases I feel a kind of constant pressure. Ganon is getting to me. Where is the next golden skulltula?

A screenshot of Link looking back in fear as Jabu-Jabu opens up his big mouth.
Do I really have to get inside him? Really?

The step-by-step of it all feels unintuitive and unwieldy. There are lots of unpleasant tasks to deal with, like holding Princess Ruto over your head as you run through Jabu-Jabu's belly, desperately jumping in holes.

Link talks to a woman. She says, "All people have hardships in their past that they would rather no one found out about."
So true.

However, the beauty and tragedy of the world, the wonderfully designed, distinct dungeons, and the lively and quirky characters please me. I like them all so much.

A Zora asks Link, "Who are you?"

Do not ever ask me to shoot all those rupees for the quiver upgrade though. I can't and won't do it. 

Link stands on a stool in someone's home, looking down at a white dog below him.

The Things Which Are Advertised To Me On Instagram

 There is an air of death to Instagram. A stench. The thing has a sort of growing emptiness fed by years of corporate re-shuffling, the kind of algorithm-tweaking that results in me seeing more autoplaying videos of undressing nineteen-year-olds than I ever would have wanted (desired number: zero), and the lingering feeling that you are walking at medium speed down an endless white corridor, getting further and further away from anyone you might be pleased to see.

Nevertheless, it's still a place full of fun, artsy, creative people, and a place where, more than anything, I will see interesting sketches and speedpaints, junk journal madness, and flatlays of bookish, lace-laden outfits. It's a place bursting with youthful, jubilant woman with Sanrio obsessions, and so I must, by law, remain there with them.

A collage featuring autumnal leaves, a green ribbed top, pink and black Onitsuka Tiger ballet flats, and a silver bunny necklace with a pink pearl.

Because of this unstoppable demographic of sweet and strange women with an eye for lace trim and shiny silver hardware (in the handbag sense, not the computer sense), and because Instagram is one of the few platforms on which I am still forced to see ADVERTISEMENTS (Tumblr long ago gifted me their ad-free subscription because of my beauty and celebrity - thank you Tumblr), I am served a lot of promotional material on there for stuff I actually quite like. As an exercise in extreme and highly commendable self-control, I shall review these for you now instead of buying them.

 

ELFSACK

An ELFSACK sponsored Instagram post showing a girl wearing a puffy pink jacket with a panda pattern.

Now, these ads tend to be for clothes or bags, more often than not, and my favourites are always the small and sort of unique brands. Little companies with odd names that fit a kind of dreamy fantasy aesthetic. Like ELFSACK (always in all caps). They have a cool, distorted logo. They have some decidedly mori girl items (yes!!! Muddy greens! Geography teacher cardigans!). Their name is ELFSACK (a sack carried by an elf?)

A photo of a girl wearing a brown puffer jacket and a long brown skirt with what appears to be a Scrooge McDuck motif.

I like their combo of decidedly weird, more flashy items (see: ultra-long Scrooge McDuck skirt), and their softer, more understated autumnal wear.

Two cute ELFSACK outfits. A girl in a beret, bomber jacket, and long shorts, next a girl in a long grey overcoat.

The beret they put this model in says it all. A few small steps away from SeΓ±orita Awesome, but with one boot firmly planted in the centre of a fairy ring.

A girl wears a collegiate cardigan and a beret.

 

PUPARI

A sponsored Instagram post showing several sort of rudimentary looking silver rings.

This is a really cute one. Maybe the cutest thing I've ever seen an advertisement for. They really have me pinned down with this. A very pretty and cute jewellery company that make these fun, sweet little animals and body parts.

A dainty pendant shaped like a bunny, with a pink pearl dangling from the centre.

My favourite item of theirs is probably this little bunny with a pink pearl dangling from it, but I also love the ears and noses they have available. I especially love that the "nose ring" has its own nose ring. Wonderful. 

A silver ring in the shape of a nose. The nose has its own tiny ring.

ONITSUKA TIGER

An ad for Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66 Boxing shoes.

Finally, Onitsuka Tiger - the cool trainer brand.

Classic Onitsuka Tiger tennis shoes, in earthy green and cream tones.Distinctive Onitsuka Tiger ballet flats in pink and black.

While I'm not a huge fan of these boxing shoes (they're just too long for me), I think their classic tennis shoes are pretty cute. I like them in this green and cream colourway. I also enjoy the kinda strange-looking ballet flats. However, I have promised myself I will only wear slip-on shoes from now on. Laces are in my past. Slip-on or nothing.

This is a promise to my feet.

Skull & Serpent

 When I visit museums, I'm always excited to see groups of people sketching the artefacts. I always really want to join them, and then destroy them by doing the best and most crazed drawing. This is a competition, I think, and I could win. But usually, I'm with someone who needs to go fast (understandable - life is short, and our legs hurt quickly), and I probably don't have a big, beautiful, chunky sketchbook on hand either.

Fortunately, we are blessed with online catalogues of museum pieces that are both fascinating to look at, and enticing to draw.

A sketch of a statuette of a young boy stepping on a skull and a snake.

One such wonder is the V&A's collections, in which I found an intriguing ivory figure of a child stepping on a skull and a snake. A tiny little goth.

An ivory statuette depicting a young, toddler-aged boy stepping on a snake and a skull.
Here he is.

The website speculates that this is "probably" a depiction of the Christ child - overcoming death (skull) and sin (snake). Other details are similarly murky. It was made in "France or possibly the Netherlands" somewhere in the estimated forty years between 1780 and 1820. This little boy is an enigma, and I really like him. 

He was the clear first choice for a sketch, and I love his serene little face, sort-of statesman-like, and the cartoonish, medieval look of that weird snake. Cute.

Detail shot of the coiled snake underneath one foot of the child. It has an open mouth with odd, human-like teeth.Detail shot of the child's face, which has a sort-of faraway, genteel look.